Two words to ponder: Conserve and Conservation. Etymologically, they are brother words both born of the Latin Conservatio. Practically, they are opposites today. I hazard to guess if there is a single issue Conservatives and Conservationists agree on. It’s rather fascinating that the Conservationists haven’t new-speak’d themselves a term for distancing themselves from conservatives. But how could they? Anticon would be self-destructive. There’s a lesson to be learned here, isn’t there? Despite Antifa acting like Fa, they don’t get confused by most people. Yet if a Conservationist declared themselves anti-conservative, something would be self-defeating in that terminology. Meditate on that. Meditate, too, on why Conservationists get more done than Conservatives, when functionally they seek the same end: The stagnation of change in a system. Different systems, of course. But do meditate on why it’s easier to prevent a forest’s destruction than it is to stop a constitution’s.
Whenever someone tells you they are Con-, you should ask what they are conserving. Chairman Xi seeks to conserve Chinese identity in the world of globohomo. Donald Trump seeks to conserve his image against the media. A Native American seeks to conserve forests they once called home. Karl Marx wanted to conserve the couch for his lethargic tumor-riddled fat arse. One can be conservative in practically any political setting, for practically any purpose. Conservative is not a political ideology. It is a desire to remain at a particular political crossroads. Where that is can be anywhere on the political grid. Instead of thinking right vs left, think of Conservatives as anti-vector. Progressives would be pro-vector. Let’s say antivec and provec for convenience.
Now, there would be a temptation to divide provecs between rightwingers and leftwingers, but even then this is utterly retarded, as there are no clear definitions anymore. Wanting to conserve your nation’s national beauty used to be considered right-wing. Today it is left-wing. The term is meaningless. So we should simple assume all provectists want to change something. Likewise, all antivectists would want to keep things the same. But, of course, no one’s like that. Every conservative wants to go back to something. Every progressive wants to move forward to something. So conservatives and progressives are definitively provectists. And the only people who are antivectists would be…
The Normies.
Ah, you see? Now you’ve politicized the normies. The largest political block of the United States. Well over 40% of the nation just doesn’t give a shit. Dangerous game here. Useful game. This model is great, because by demonizing antivectists, you force the normies into realpolitik. They just want to conserve what they’re used to. Lazy arses who can’t be asked. Pick a side, already!
A REAL-POLITIQUE OF DISGUST
But really, do we want them picking a side? Now that we’ve modeled how to radicalize the normies to stop being conservatives- and by that I mean conservative to what they are used to-, we need a political definition for how to direct their angst. We don’t really want the Normies joining any of the infinite angles a Provec can be. There is a circle of acceptable politics all provectists fall into. Any angle they want of right and left mixture you will find some on. But really, we want the antivectists stepping over the circle entirely. Fuck ‘em. They’ve done nothing but bother the normies all their lives. What to call this Fuck’em -ism. Fuckemism? I mean, we could go with that. let’s say Fuqumism to sound French. All good politics is spelled French.
Fuqumism c'est le Politique de dégoût. It is the manifest disgust of all destinies. It isn’t a desire to burn down the system, so much a desire to watch it burn from a safe and comfortable distance. And if they get pushed… Oh boy. If you want an image of Radical Fuqumism, imagine a jolly BLM man and a jolly maga man holding hands, poaching elephants and donkeys, forever.
The purpose of radicalizing the antivectists is to make them into Fuqumists. The sooner you start using this system, the sooner you can get off the political compass and start ascending outside the rank punditry of this ridiculous cold civil war we are in. A world where conservatism is left wing, but conservatives are right wing. A world where antifa is fa, and fa is into femboys. A world where the same government that murdered a million Iraqis over false allegations of WMDs wants to commission a terror report over a few dead cops from drunk peasants. A ridiculous, mad world which calls vengeance a form of justice, and imagines utopia while the births to maintain it are below sustainable.
Step over these idiots, fellow Fuqumites. Forget Trump. Forget Biden. Fuck ‘em. Let’s all vote the town drunk into office and laugh at Cspan when he shits on the floor.
“To tolerate does not mean to forget that what we tolerate does not deserve anything more”
― Nicolás Gómez Dávila
I have to say that the sides remain irrelevant simply because the "fa is into femboys" originates from the American Right always having to be somewhat-Liberal in nature, because Liberalism is at the heart of Americanism, and therefore to be anti- Liberal is to be contrary to anything that America will be in its current 250-year-long experiment.